The High Court of Karnataka has been at the center of national news in February 2026, delivering a series of landmark judgments. From quashing a high-profile political defamation case to taking a tough stance on environmental exploitation and massive cyber crimes, the court’s recent decisions have far-reaching impacts. If you want to understand what is happening inside the state’s highest courtroom, here is a detailed breakdown of the top cases, the background behind them, and what these rulings mean for the public.
Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi Quashed
In a major political development, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed a criminal defamation case filed by the state Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. The case was officially quashed by Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, who stated that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the legal process.
The Background of the Dispute
The controversy began just before the May 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections. The Congress party launched a campaign that included newspaper advertisements featuring a “Corruption Rate Card.” These ads alleged that the ruling BJP government at the time had fixed bribe rates for various government postings and public works. In response, the state BJP filed a defamation complaint, claiming the advertisements were entirely false and based on fanciful imagination.
Why the Court Dismissed the Case
During the hearings, the defense argued that there was no direct evidence linking Rahul Gandhi to the creation or authorization of these specific newspaper advertisements. Furthermore, the court noted that the complaint was filed by the state BJP as a political entity rather than the state government itself. Because there was no proof of Gandhi’s direct involvement in publishing the ads, the court ruled to set aside the proceedings against him.
What Happens Next
This ruling sets a strong legal precedent regarding third-party defamation complaints and political advertising in India. With the charges against Rahul Gandhi cleared in this specific instance, it limits how political parties can use criminal defamation laws against rival national leaders for local election campaigns.
State Government Pulled Up Over Illegal Sand Mining
Beyond politics, the High Court of Karnataka has also turned its attention to a severe environmental crisis. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha has initiated a suo motu Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to tackle rampant illegal sand mining across rivers in the state.
The Trigger for the Investigation
The court took action after reading multiple alarming media reports published in late January 2026. These reports detailed how the sand mafia was operating openly, often mining sand from river basins at night and causing severe ecological damage. The issue reached a boiling point when the Karnataka Home Minister admitted in the State Assembly that highly influential people from various political parties were involved in the racket, expressing helplessness in entirely curbing the menace.
The Court’s Strict Directives
The High Court judges found this admission alarming. They noted that if the state’s own police and home department feel helpless against the sand mafia, the public cannot rely on the state machinery to protect natural resources. The court has given the Karnataka government four weeks to file a detailed response explaining their plan of action. The bench also warned that if the state fails to show progress, the court might hand the investigation over to a central agency or a specially formed Special Investigation Team (SIT). The next hearing is scheduled for April 2026.
The ₹225 Crore ‘Crime Thriller’ Cyber Fraud
In an era of rising digital scams, the High Court recently dealt with a corporate fraud case so complex that the judge described it as being akin to a “crime thriller.”
How the Scam Unfolded
The case revolves around a businessman who was duped out of ₹7.15 crore. Fraudsters promised to help him secure a massive ₹225 crore corporate finance loan from the State Bank of India (SBI). To make the scam look legitimate, the accused created a highly convincing counterfeit SBI website, generated fake official emails, and even manipulated One Time Passwords (OTPs). When the victim tried to withdraw the promised loan funds, the website froze, and the scammers eventually cut off all communication.
The Court’s Firm Stance
The accused individuals approached the High Court of Karnataka, requesting that the First Information Report (FIR) against them be quashed. They argued that the issue was merely a civil dispute over unpaid commissions. However, Justice M. Nagaprasanna firmly rejected this argument. The court ruled that fabricating electronic communications, creating fake banking websites, and impersonating bank officials are severe criminal offenses, not simple civil disagreements. The criminal proceedings against the accused will now continue in the lower courts.
Read More : PM Kisan Samman Nidhi 2026
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Where is the High Court of Karnataka located?
The principal bench of the High Court is located in the state capital, Bengaluru. It also has two permanent benches located in Dharwad and Kalaburagi to serve citizens in the northern parts of the state.
Who is the current Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court?
As of recent updates in 2025 and 2026, the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court is Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru.
Why was the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi dismissed?
The court dismissed the case because there was no material evidence proving that Rahul Gandhi authorized or was directly involved in publishing the 2023 “Corruption Rate Card” advertisements. The judge ruled that continuing the trial would be an abuse of the legal process.
What does a ‘suo motu’ PIL mean?
A suo motu PIL is a public interest litigation where the court takes up a case on its own initiative, usually after noticing a severe public issue in the news, rather than waiting for a citizen or lawyer to file a formal petition.
Can the High Court order a CBI probe into the sand mining issue?
Yes. The High Court has stated that if the state government fails to take effective action against the sand mafia, it possesses the authority to transfer the investigation to a central agency like the CBI or establish a Special Investigation Team.